On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:28 PM, piezobw <jon@...> wrote: > > > The awkward thing was returning to a forum that once had a majority of > experimental printmakers - only to find that those who experiment are the > minority, and some using the out of the box experience are terribly terribly > protective of it. > > So Clayton, despite putting a ton of great research derived info online, and those who use ABW in their printing, aren't "experimental" printmakers? Does your club have a special handshake? I haven't used ABW in years, not because I have anything against it, but because the studio where I work desired to use monochrome inksets. As a result, I've used MIS and Cone black ink sets at the studio. For my personal work, I use a 4880 for color, and for BW I've been concentrating on making carbon tissue transfer prints, not because I think they're better than everything else, but because I like making them, and I like their unique qualities for my work. Hence, I'm not getting defensive about my use of ABW, I'm getting defensive about the dismissive attitude that you and Tyler have expressed here concerning the work and techniques of long-term participants in this forum. I find it hard to believe that both of you can't tell the difference between a perfectly acceptable statement of your preferences versus the making of derogatory and incendiary comments. Your quotation above is an example of the latter. While I was considering switching over to your color inks when the need arises. I won't be doing so. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Reply to Jon and Tyler re ABW - Was Aard. Tests
2010-04-09 by pdesmidt tds.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.