Clayton, If you genuinely feel that way, then don't contribute to the paranoia that someone is out to hurt the members of this forum. I can assure you that if someone is, it definitely is not Tyler and definitely not me. I made tend towards the poetic rather than the scientific. But I try to distill the essence of what I am communicating, rather than to cloak it, even as I tend not to filter my thoughts very much. You don't have to read between the lines of my statements, though I often write in a way meant to stir thought. The meaning of one word can be powerful and extraordinary. The same word can appear insightful to some and hateful to others. It is not the word, but how the word is received that reveals the most. Jon Cone Piezography --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "ClaytonJ" <cj@...> wrote: > My response was to the nature of some of your remarks which can be easily interpreted > as put downs (intended that way or not), which I think hurts this forum, > and to Tyler's use of the word "sucks", as a complete dismissal of a widely > popular process (which is very unlike his normally respectful tone here). > > > Regards, > Clayton
Message
Re: Reply to Jon and Tyler re ABW - Was Aard. Tests
2010-04-09 by piezobw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.