think that it belongs on DTXpressions instead. Here goes: > > REVIEWER GUIDELINES > > 1. Construction/road worthiness: > rack material (aluminum/steel/other). > rack size (standard or proprietary lengths and diameters). > mounting hardware (metal/plastic/other). > pad type (drum/cymbal/pole/other). > pad size (diameters/lengths). > pad fit and finish (WAF, as well as general build quality) > playing surface (gum-rubber/mesh/metal/acrylic/other). > trigger type (piezo/FSR; mono/stereo/dual). > pad adjustments (sensitivity/polarity/tilt/other). > accessories provided (cables/splitters/cymbal stoppers/other). > 2. Documentation--clarity and comprehensiveness. > 3. Design innovations (as stated by manufacturer or noted by > reviewer). > 4. Plug-and-playability/ease of set-up: > recommended module settings (reviewer's and/or manufacturer's). > 5. Electronic performance--false or double triggering/hot spots. > 6. Feel/acoustic noise level. > 7. Comparison to DTX or other counterpart, if applicable. > 8. Sound quality via headphones/amp (an incorrigibly subjective > measure, though possibly mitigated by design specs). > 9. Value, relative to the list/street price of similar products, as > well as the "cost no object" imperative. > 10. Warranty/customer service/company contact info. Ed(fm)/Vern, Looks good. OGD
Message
Re: Reviewer Guidelines
2003-09-04 by oldguydrummer
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.