Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

Yamaha DTXpress/DTXplorer/DTXtreme

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:44 UTC

Message

Re: Roland (hush my mouth) TD5 and 7

2003-06-17 by liberatusvirus

--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "moosetication" 
<moosetication@y...> wrote:
> 
> I notice these are coming up for not unreasonable prices at the 
> moment. Does the panel have any views on these rather old modules?
> 
> Stewart

Stewart,

I don't remember how they sounded to make an adequate comparison 
with anything, but it seems to me that you could do a lot worse than 
the TD7 for a second module. First of all, the basic technology 
hasn't changed that much. I think that the TD8 is regarded as a 
genuine improvement, but the TD7 still has stereo inputs and dual 
zones. It has only half as many actual sounds as the TD8--or 
DTXpress, for that matter--but how many of the 1,000 voices do we 
actually use, or like? Like the Yamaha, it is a 16 bit engine, and 
its ergonomics are certainly in the same league, if not a little 
better. 

That said, one question for me is, With the next wave of technology 
about to spring, with probably a bit of trickle-down to follow 
shortly (if not immediately) thereafter, how much do we want to 
invest of our fresh-squeezed cash on old equipment? I know that it's 
only $200 or so, but I've bought something inexpensive impulsively 
in the past because I HAD TO HAVE IT NOW, only to find out that if 
I'd waited, I would have had something better (case in point, my 
early-generation plasma monitor). 

Okay, I'm meandering. Also keep in mind that I once suggested to 
Stephen that the Alesis DM5 wouldn't make a bad second module 
either, and he absolutely loathed it, scurrying back to the DTXpress 
as fast as he could. But out on a limb, I like the TD7 for that 
purpose, though I don't know how long I'd want to be stuck with it 
if it left me that much longer out of the market for something new.

Ed

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.