Thanks for that comprehensive answer, Ed! Now I'm in the picture. --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "liberatusvirus" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > Hi Nick, > > One reason why upgrading to the DTXtreme doesn't come under much > discussion lately is that it has been continued since January and is > in short supply. Where it can be found it is usually discounted > heavily. You'll notice some activity on the board about getting hold > of the module. The pads of the kit were elegant-looking wooden > shells covered with mylar heads, which could be swapped for woven > ones, and those who use them usually praise the sound and response. > The cymbals were the usual Yamaha wedges. The rack and hardware were > more sturdy than that of the DTXpress, and the tom mounts were RIMS, > I think. The module supported chaining 32 kits and stacking > six/alternating nine voices instead of the DTXpress's two. It had > more versatile parameters, especially for the snare, as well as > positional sensing. A storage card, which most people seemed to find > inadequate, could hold 4 MB of voices, kits, or songs. It had much > better ergonomics--big, back lit, and well appointed with knobs that > facilitated adjustments on the fly. Yamaha is going to release > something updated late in the summer, and truth be told, some parts > of the package needed it. Rumor has it that the module is worth > waiting for. > > Ed > > > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Nick Carroll" <njcarroll56@y...> > wrote: > > I know that the DTXtreme can connect more pads, and it has more > pad > > sounds than the DTXpress. But apart from that, can anyone tell me > > what advantages it offers over the DTXpress? (I note that there > is > > much discussion of combining the DTXpress with Roland hardware and > > other brand products, but virtually no talk of upgrading to a > > DTXtreme.)
Message
Re: DTXtreme advantages?
2003-04-16 by Nick Carroll
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.