--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "temp1111" <temp1111@w...> wrote: > Here are some first impressions on the DTX2S from a 25 year veteran acoustic drummer. I have never touched or even seen up close an E kit until my recent purchase of the DTX2S, so I have no other kit to compare to, I'm simply throwing out some impartial, first impressions. Vic, Your posts (along with those of drumsonly, cheakster, and OGD) are valuable insights into the DTXT2S. You've probably gone as deeply into the module as any consumer at this point. Although it's not possible to please everyone all of the time, even when you're trying, Yamaha at the outset did not commit to calling this module their fully "professional" unit. If I remember correctly, the idea was to test the waters with the DTXT2T and proceed with something more elaborate if it caught fire. I personally didn't think that this plan made much sense; nor do I know whether it's still operative. That said, however, taking what drum modules usually do and cost into consideration, this one seems to be a winner, despite your legitimate observations and without soft soap. Drum modules have notoriously lagged behind their synth brothers in computing power and versatility, largely because manufacturers are not convinced about their market. They just don't get the resources (meaning money and R&D) that other electronic equipment does. The DTXT2S, however, shows that the situation is improving, but it might take some familiarity with the past market to notice. Hell, the technology of my main module (ddrum) is 10 years old; computers have changed almost beyond recognition since then. Shameful. And even Yamaha, for all its advances at a price point, is anachronistic in many respects, possibly because it was in development for so long. > - Love my vendor for being helpful and flexible with my order (Drumbalaya) > - Hate Yamaha distribution for changing delivery dates 6 times ranging from very early Spring to what turned out to be late July. Are you listening, Mr. Morin? Does everyone know how Ed (no relation) and Charlotte started Drumbalaya from a labor of love and turned it into edrummers' paradise, with nearly every possible e-drum product and accessory covered and tested? Customer service has never wavered. It's safe to say that without Drumabalaya, we wouldn't know about, let alone have, many of the components that make the rounds today. > - Love the fact that the rack is sized the same as my Gibralter hardware so it was easily integrated. > - Hate the flimsy build of the hardware. The tubes are extremely delicate and I have trouble envisioning them taking the beating on the road that my Gibralter/Pearl equipment does. The clamps are cheap plastic and I have concerns about their longevity as well. Additionally, unlike the Gibralter clamps which have a clamshell design which allows them to be easily removed and replaced, the Yamaha clamps require complete disassembly of that portion of the kit to slide the clamp off or onto the bar. Not so convenient. Price point, price point, price point. To sell kits at $2500, $1500, or $1000, Yamaha needed to cut corners. Sometimes you shoot for the lowest common denominator and let the buyer pick up the slack when, or if, he needs to. > - Love the ball and socket adjustment for the tom holders, by far the easiest, fastest adjustment method I've ever seen. Should become an industry standard for acoustic drums. > - Hate that they didn't put a mounting port in the SD so I didn't have to have an extra stand in my way, also hate the height of the SD stand isnt high enough when legs are fully extended. OGD made the same point about the snare. It will be a nuissance for DTXpress users, for example, to integrate one into their stock configurations without a rack mount. > - Love the intuitive interface of the module. > - Hate the fact that the manual is written from the perspective of someone who is already familiar with E-kits, there is no clear 'start here', 'do this next' context for the complete novice to E-kits. Even those familiar with e-kits aren't convinced that the manual is well written. At one point, a core of us (with Stewart at the helm) were working on an alternate DTX-type manual (Stephen dubbed it "Drum and Drummer"), but it has proven difficult to complete. Now we can add information about the DTXT to the rest of the unfinished business. > - Love the quality and diversity of the voices > - Hate that there are only 4 tom voices for each kit. For a kit with 2000+ voices, they couldn't foresee that someone would add more E-toms or be triggering an acoustic kit with more than 4 toms? I haven't gotten to deeply work with tuning the preset sizes, but without a shell diameter and depth setting, I don't see this as being a great way to go. We really need additional tom sizes and this is one of my biggest gripes right now. COSM. :-) > - Love the InsFX option > - Hate that there aren't 4 instead of 2, and I really hate that we can only assign 1 of the InsFX channels to a voice. In a situation where the user is trying to recreated a preset voice, but must send it to an IND channel, we depend on the InsFX channels, but if we need to combine both REV and CHO we are stuck choosing either/or. > > - Love the fact that all necessary cables were included > - wish they were a little heavier duty and not prelabled. Price point and practicality. E-drum cables, unlike those that carry actual instrument voices or recorded sounds to amps and speakers, carry only an electrical impulses that get translated into voices stored elsewhere. From that perspective, hefty cables are unnecessary. Any comments? Some people love the labelling, having lobbied long and hard for it. > Overall, I am pleased with the kit, but I think they took some shortcuts. I'm really miffed about the lack of additional tom sizes and I'm hoping a download site will pop up. I also am thankful that this forum exists, because it provides a great place to get and give ideas and feedback. Calling them as you need them is the name of the game. No arguments about the shortcuts, but maybe an argument about the extent to which they detract from the kit. For many, price and manner of use mollify them considerably. Our initial information was that DTXperience would include sounds for downloading. Ed
Message
Re: Thoughts on DTX2S
2004-08-15 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.