Hehehe, while I prefer to use well defined terms, I don\ufffdt want to start flame wars about the meaning of VA :-). As far as I can see, all "true" VAs are built to simulate analog synths, i.e. they use classic subtractive synthesis which happens to follow the scheme VCO, VCF, VCA plus some goodies (there is no real V in these, of course). Therefore, the typical VAs to me are Nordlead, Virus, Q, AN1X etc. THey try to model their analogue counterparts, especially doing the little nasty analog anormalities that give the warm sound we all love. The XT is somewhere in between, for it you can limit yourself to use just the "analog" waveforms (SIN, SAW, SQR) but I think the XT tends more to be a wavetable synth with a classic subtractive synthesis architecture. Since the main feature is not emulating analog circuitry, but the wavetable synthesis, I wouldn\ufffdt call the XT a VA, but it\ufffds something pretty close. Happy evolving alltogether :-) Later, Oliver
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: Evolver as an FX Processor // MWXT
2003-02-21 by c00kie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.