> Ah, I see. Well I don't know the answer, but it > seems from reading > the specs, that having waves in the two digital > oscillators is not > the same thing as having a "wavetable" synth. As > such there is no > real correlation between one wave and its neighbor > wave, so the > actions of lfos and envelopes etc on which wave is > playing would be > dependent on the happenstance of the order of the > waves in the osc's. good point... however, if there was an added parameter to define "boundaries" for which waves would be "swept" (ie. out of waves 0-96, it would only sweep between 36-48, or 68-72, or whatever)... as well as a parameter to define whether it would sweep forward, backward, or in both directions... well, it would still be a pretty nice and useful feature... plus, a random/S&H waveform on the LFO could randomize the selection order as well, no? :-) oh well. maybe I should shut up... it's not even out yet and here I am with a wishlist already :-| ===== http://www.mp3.com/Spectralab alternate e-mail: spectralab@... __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com
Message
Re: [Evolver] Re: New sounds online
2002-09-18 by kevin paisley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.