Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

Re: [AVR-Chat] Digest Number 971

Re: [AVR-Chat] Digest Number 971

2005-03-15 by David Jones

>>> <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> 16/03/2005 12:45:03 am >>>
>It's delivery day, and once again, my AVR tools have all decided to go
nuts.
>Anyone have any ideas for preventing this garbage?

Yes, use tools which don't go nuts!
In a professional environment you can't aford to have problems like
this. Blaming your tools doesn't cut it with management ;->

>I've had this happen any number of times, and it always "goes away"
after a 
>while, but I REALLY CAN"T AFFORD THIS SHIT ANYMORE. (anyone sensing a
high 
>level of frustration here?)
>At this point, I feel like taking all my AVR tools out into the
parking 
>lot, making a pile of them, and pounding them into sand with a
splitting maul.
>I love the chips, but I really despise the tools.

I'm afraid the chips are next to useless if the tools aren't doing what
you expect of them. Seriously you need to think about moving platforms
if it's causing you so much grief.

Do you have other platforms to fall back on? A good designer will never
stick to one platform anyway, they'll use the right one for each job.

I would not let the love of a particular chip outweigh the practical
considerations of getting the job done. Don't continue to use tools
which cause you grief, it's not worth it. I've been there, I switched
when my back was to the wall and the white truck was ready to pick me up
and cart me away in a straight jacket. I now sleep better at night.

Dave :)



**********************

The information contained in this email is intended for the named recipient(s) only, it may also be privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance upon it. No warranties or assurances are made in relation to the safety and content of this email and any attachments. No liability is accepted for any consequences arising from it. Any comments contained within this email may or may not be solely the senders and not those of Sercel Australia Pty Ltd. Therefore Sercel Australia Pty Ltd will accept no responsibility or liability for any such comments and/or attachments.

**********************

Re: [AVR-Chat] Digest Number 971

2005-03-15 by Dave VanHorn

At 05:28 PM 3/15/2005, David Jones wrote:

> >>> <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> 16/03/2005 12:45:03 am >>>
> >It's delivery day, and once again, my AVR tools have all decided to go
>nuts.
> >Anyone have any ideas for preventing this garbage?
>
>Yes, use tools which don't go nuts!
>In a professional environment you can't aford to have problems like
>this. Blaming your tools doesn't cut it with management ;->

I know, I am management. Yesterday's little "issue" cost me about $500.


>I'm afraid the chips are next to useless if the tools aren't doing what
>you expect of them. Seriously you need to think about moving platforms
>if it's causing you so much grief.

Hmm.. Then I have to weigh loosing my experience base against a "maybe" 
benefit.
When I was doing Zilog, their tools were junk too, but Signum made some 
great ones, albeit rather expensive at about $8000 in '92bucks for an ice.

>Do you have other platforms to fall back on? A good designer will never
>stick to one platform anyway, they'll use the right one for each job.

Lately, all my jobs have been well suited to one or another AVR.
There might be something nicer out there, but again, there's significant 
uncertanity.

>I would not let the love of a particular chip outweigh the practical
>considerations of getting the job done. Don't continue to use tools
>which cause you grief, it's not worth it. I've been there, I switched
>when my back was to the wall and the white truck was ready to pick me up
>and cart me away in a straight jacket. I now sleep better at night.

Is that who that is out at the corner?  They've been watching me, and 
tapping my phone calls, and I think shooting rays into my head with 
lasers..  (only kidding.. Really!)

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.