Yahoo Groups archive

AVR-Chat

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:41 UTC

Thread

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

Re: [AVR-Chat] Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-23 by John Samperi

At 05:16 PM 23/04/2008, you wrote:
>And it's USB...

...and I bet is not Studio compatible.
"For a few dollars more", hey great title for a movie,
you can get the REAL Atmel AVRISP.

Regards

John Samperi

********************************************************
Ampertronics Pty. Ltd.
11 Brokenwood Place Baulkham Hills, NSW 2153 AUSTRALIA
Tel. (02) 9674-6495       Fax (02) 9674-8745
Email: john@ampertronics.com.au
Website  http://www.ampertronics.com.au
*Electronic Design * Custom Products * Contract Assembly
********************************************************

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by stevech11

Not on e-Bay, but I recently purchased this simple Atmel compatible
JTAG ICE device. Works with AVR Studio.

easy to build. $17.

http://www.nkcelectronics.com/avr-jtag-ice-clone-debugger-programmer-kit.html

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by brewski922

Looks nice, at a nice price. However, I'm kind of reluctant buying 
equipment using an RS232 interface. Much preferred it being USB.

Do you know of one that is USB?

Do you think a USB RS232 adapter, like SmileyMicros has might work?

Mike

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "stevech11" <stevech@...> wrote:
>
> Not on e-Bay, but I recently purchased this simple Atmel compatible
> JTAG ICE device. Works with AVR Studio.
> 
> easy to build. $17.
> 
>
http://www.nkcelectronics.com/avr-jtag-ice-clone-debugger-programmer-kit.html
>

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by stevech11

I have two USB to serial adapters. I chose based on ones that use the
FTDI chipset (logo on package, usually). Haven't had issues other than
some odd non-AVR-related software that tries to toggle RTS/DTR at the
milisecond level.

Currently, I have the AVR under test's serial port connected to a USB
to serial and COM1 on the PC connected to JTAG.


--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "brewski922" <Brewskister@...> wrote:
>
> Looks nice, at a nice price. However, I'm kind of reluctant buying 
> equipment using an RS232 interface. Much preferred it being USB.
> 
> Do you know of one that is USB?
> 
> Do you think a USB RS232 adapter, like SmileyMicros has might work?
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "stevech11" <stevech@> wrote:
> >
> > Not on e-Bay, but I recently purchased this simple Atmel compatible
> > JTAG ICE device. Works with AVR Studio.
> > 
> > easy to build. $17.
> > 
> >
>
http://www.nkcelectronics.com/avr-jtag-ice-clone-debugger-programmer-kit.html
> >
>

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by Don Kinzer

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "stevech11" <stevech@...> wrote:
> I recently purchased this simple
> Atmel compatible JTAG ICE device.

Unfortunately, it's not compatible with newer devices, i.e. it's not
JTAG MkII compatible.  If you're working with the devices that it
supports, though, it looks like a good deal.

Don Kinzer
ZBasic Microcontrollers
http://www.zbasic.net

Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by stevech11

re below... I'm using it on an "old" mega128, 16MHz crystal.

--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Don Kinzer" <dkinzer@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "stevech11" <stevech@> wrote:
> > I recently purchased this simple
> > Atmel compatible JTAG ICE device.
> 
> Unfortunately, it's not compatible with newer devices, i.e. it's not
> JTAG MkII compatible.  If you're working with the devices that it
> supports, though, it looks like a good deal.
> 
> Don Kinzer
> ZBasic Microcontrollers
> http://www.zbasic.net
>

[AVR-Chat] Re: Inexpensive AVR-ISP on e-bay

2008-04-25 by davec

>Looks nice, at a nice price. However, I'm kind of reluctant buying
>equipment using an RS232 interface. Much preferred it being USB.
>
>Do you know of one that is USB?

See original post in this thread.

Dave

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.