On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 08:52:39PM -0700, Larry Barello wrote: > It would be redundant to get both the STK500 and the MAVRIC. The > STK500 is a development platform & programmer. The MAVRIC is simply > a development board with the biggest AVR chip available. Essentially, correct, but it's a little more than that - MAVRIC includes a 32K serial I2C eeprom, I2C real time clock, and 128K of external SRAM on board and a couple of other features (I2C pull-up resistors, 32KHz RTC Clock crystal on TOSC1&2, etc).. MAVRIC-II instead has an RS485 interface and the external memory is optional. Most boards intended primarily for development boards don't have those features. Other than that, I agree with Larry in that if you are going to get just one, and your primary purpose is for learning, then the STK500 is the right choice. Even if you got a MAVRIC / MAVRIC-II, you will still need a programmer, and unless you make your own you will need to buy one, such as the STK500 or perhaps the AVRISP. You really can't go wrong with the STK500. It is a self contained dev board that supports all of Atmel's DIP packages. Especially if you are just learning, the STK500 is suitable with its builtin switches and LEDs for experimenting. And later when maybe you want to move up to a MAVRIC or MAVRIC-II when you have a more specific application where one of those boards is suitable, the STK500 still pulls its weight with it's 10-pin ISP programming header which serves double-duty as a programmer for my and other third party boards that have the matching 10-pin ISP header for programming. > Personally, I recommend the STK500. It is cheap, flexible and has > both ISP and parallel programming modes available and can supply > it's own clock signal. The latter can be *INVALUABLE* when you > select innapropriate bits while programming the fuses of the AVR > chips. And it handles all flavors of AVR chips - something that > comes in very handy as your skills grow. Ditto. -Brian -- Brian Dean http://www.bdmicro.com/
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] Starter kits
2004-04-05 by Brian Dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.