AVR-Chat

Thomas Keller wrote:
> Russell Shaw wrote:
> 
>>Thomas Keller wrote:
>>
>>>stevech wrote:
>>>
>>>>What in the world would drive the need for 5Mbps sustained from an AVR (what
>>>>port at 5Mbps anyway) via 802.11? As you may know, '11b at the TCP layer is
>>>>6Mbps; 11g can be faster.
>>>>      
>>>   Well, I am not at liberty to disclose the details.  Suffice (I hope) 
>>>to say that thr wearable electronics will be instrumenting the body 
>>>movements of a "dancer," whose digitzed movement data will be used to 
>>>control other aspects f the stage environment for a performance art piece.
>>>    
>>When you consider that useable audio can be encoded at 8kbytes/sec, 5Mbits/sec
>>seems a bit over done just to measure 50 channels of movement.
>>  
>    1287 channels of sensor data at 12 bits/channel, times 2000 
> samples/channel/sec.

Ok. 2k/sec is still quite high. If you transmit the differences (delta modulation),
a lot of compression would happen. A/u-law companding could be done too.