Caught the retfie, scratched head. What I am seeing in the original question I posed is a holistic approach to embedded programming. Maybe Dijkstra is worth a reread. Dennis ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zack Widup" <w9sz@prairienet.org> To: <AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:27 PM Subject: RE: [AVR-Chat] C textbook > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Chuck Hackett wrote: > >> >> Well, someone did suggest "Embedded C Programming and the Atmel AVR". I >> have >> found this book useful in getting started with AVRs. I knew C before I >> started >> with AVRS but I'm by no means an 'experienced' C programmer (i.e.: one >> who can >> write a whole program without the language manual at hand). Part of my >> problem >> is that, in my professional life, I used C and many other languages close >> to C >> which means that they sometimes get muddled up in my aging mind :-) >> > > Haha - that has been happening to me for years writing assembler as I > switch from one micro to another. I still do some PIC programming and > I've been working on a project with the 10F200. After I've done this for a > while with PIC's, I need to refresh my memory on the mnemonics of the AVR, > and vice versa. > > The observant reader might've caught me in a recent posting noting > "retfie" (which is the PIC mnemonic) rather than "reti" (which is the AVR > nmemonic). > > I promise I won't do it again! :-) > > Zack > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat] C textbook
2006-01-04 by Dennis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.