Finally said the heck with it and wrote every SRAM manufacturer I could find an address for. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "poitsplace" <lmburt@e...> wrote: > Here's what I don't get. One of the most > important uses of SRAM and parallel EEPROM > and Flash is as microcontroller memory. If > you'll look over the datasheets of MOST of > your simple MCU's you'll find something kind > of important. Almost all of them multiplex > 8 bits of the address with the data lines. > > I've taken apart lots of equipment and I > see that even manufacturers get stuck with > the same BS that we do. You'll usually > find a latch...interfacing to that memory. > > CONSIDERING that the amount of space it would > take to replicate that same latch on the die > of a SRAM chip is smaller than a grain of > salt...why the hell hasn't someone pulled > their heads out of their posteriors long > enough to see that there's a very real NEED > for a parallel SRAM, Flash and EEPROM with > a multiplexed data/address bus??? > > Not only would this eliminate a whole chip > from many projects and commercial circuit > boards...it would cut down the size of the > RAM chip as well. One could easily fit > up to 128k of SRAM on a 24pin chip > VCC, VSS, ALE, DA0-7, A8-15 and one for > either chip enable (on 64k chips) or bank > select on 128k chips. > > This is of course completely ignoring the > idea of multiplexing all data and address > lines (one of those would only have 16 > pins) > > Ok, finished ranting
Message
Re: Something I don't get about SRAM
2004-03-02 by poitsplace
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.