1. Be sure to read the data sheet for the regulators. I just redesigned my board and chose to use a national semi LDO which does not like MLC caps. I happen to also like MLC caps as generally they work great. I also had a heavy load which i found drooped my input source enough that my switching regulator would also droop 20 millivots. So what i did was put the heavy load on the 12VDC incomming supply and I used the LDO regulator to regulate that 12VDC down to 10.2 and then on to my switcher which generatest the +/-5 and 3.2VDC. Now my analog and AVR will not see the droop. I also recommend ferrite beads on the incomming power and ground lines. I found this helps with EMC filtering. Al Welch --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Murphree" <mike@t...> wrote: > Jim Wagner said: > > > > Tantalum caps are nice because of small size and low ESR. > > ESR isn't much of a requirement in linear regulators. But, > > they cost more, have limited voltages and values, and have > > a tendancy to destroy themselves (ie, explode or burst into > > flames) if not in a current-limited circuit. Thus, putting > > them in a place where they directly "see" battery power is > > asking for trouble. It is less of an issue on the output > > since the regulator, itself, provides current limiting. > > They also tend to be more attractive on the output side > > since the larger value is needed there. A general rule > > commonly used by designers is to specify a tantalum voltage > > rating that is about 2X the actual working voltage. > > We have typically used MLC (multilayer ceramics) on switching supplies > with some additional electrolytics if needed for bulk capacitance. The > MLC capacitors have an extremely low ESR and can be more effective than > tantalum capacitors. Also ceramic capacitors are more tolerant of applied > voltages and are often tested to 4X or more of rated value at the factory. > > Mike
Message
Re: proper power supply filtering
2005-05-16 by alwelch93021
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.