--- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Mucha" <dave_mucha@y...> wrote: > OK, so if you wanted to monitor > an analog value, an external ADC > would be best if the speed of > the samples were high. If you need a sample rate higher than the AVR can provide, the only way is to use an external converter. Remember (from earlier posts in this thread) there is a speed/accuracy tradeoff available in the AVR. If you select the higher ADC speed, you loose some accuracy. > for the successive approximation, > would the accuracy be higher if > the process were relatively steady > and the change between readings > were rather small ? No. Successive approximation wipes the slate clean and starts again for every conversion. > Temperature is a very slow moving > process so one would not expect to > see a process swing of more than a > few percent over a few minutes. > So, would that mean internal ADC > readings would be pretty accurate ? This is an ideal application of the internal ADC. Use the lower sample rate, clocking at 200kHz, for best accuracy. If you are using a thermistor, you don't even need an external reference voltage. Just work "ratiometrically" by connecting the fixed resistor / thermistor divider to whatever you use as a reference. Just don't use VCC without cleaning it up, ideally with an inductor and capacitor. Graham.
Message
Re: [AVR-Chat]Anyone used the ADC before?
2004-07-30 by Graham Davies
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.