I'd think that the low speed confg would be fine. --- In AVR-Chat@yahoogroups.com, dlc <dlc@...> wrote: > > I've used CAN networking at 250Kbps on runs of up to 1000 feet with no > problems. Lower frequencies can tolerate longer runs. However, if you > can deal with very low baud rates (which are less sensitive to timing > and impedance issues), of say 9600 and lower, you can simply use any > USART with "9th bit" addressing mode and CAN transceivers to get very > long runs. Pay close attention to ground issues on long runs since you > can build up large ground potential differences that can damage devices. > > Your 100Kbps rate is pretty slow for CAN, no big deal there. CAN > networking is a broadcast bus, every node hears every message, each node > typically sets filters to only listen to its own address. > > One project that I worked on had a "star" CAN network with hubs that > echoed messages between arms of the star, so your idea is fine. You can > also do CAN as a true buss where all nodes hang off of the same wires. > Make sure to terminate your runs whichever way you choose to go. > > The hardware CAN module can give you full CAN addressing, with the usual > futzing about with the control registers for "free". If you go the > USART route you'd need to develop your own networking protocol. With > the extended CAN networking scheme you will be sending 13 byte packages > with 8 bytes being the payload and the other 5 bytes being protocol > related. With your own USART networking scheme you have to/get to pick > your own payload and protocol overhead. > > CAN is a very flexible networking scheme, but there are details that you > must follow for it to work properly. > > DLC > > Chuck Hackett wrote: > > I preface this question with the fact that I have very limited knowledge of > > CAN bus and DeviceNet technologies (I do have a background in data > > communications from both the EE and software engineering perspective). I > > have only 'skimmed' the description of CAN bus and DeviceNet on Wikipedia. > > I know that there are Atmel devices such as the ATMega16M1 that implement > > much of the CAN network support in hardware (skimmed the ATMega16M1 > > datasheet). > > > > I understand that CAN works well for 'local area' sensor networks such as in > > a automobiles, etc. but can I leverage the Atmel CAN support for a network > > that is physically much larger (i.e.: one with significant propagation > > delays)? > > > > I am currently implementing a network of (hopefully) low cost network nodes > > using ATMega16s connected via multi-master, half-duplex RS-485. The network > > is: > > > > 1) Outdoors > > 2) Length: 1,000s of feet using one pair from a CAT-5 cable (other pairs > > used for other control tasks). I anticipate breaking the net into subnets > > with intelligent (buffered) 'bridge' devices if the physical layer requires > > it. > > 3) Bus/power surge protection provided by transorbs, etc. > > 4) Data rate: As fast as practical to reduce message latency but I don't > > anticipate needing an excessively high data rate. For the moment let's say > > on the order of 100 kbs. > > 5) Message Traffic: Most messages are broadcast type messages containing > > status info that any node may consume to support its work, others are > > addressed to specific nodes. Some messages are more time sensitive than > > others but there are also messages that are sent more or less continuously > > as bus bandwidth allows. > > > > Would it be possible/practical to use the Atmel CAN support in this > > environment? > > > > I read somewhere that CAN was used up to 400m due to timing considerations. > > Can this distance be extended by altering (possibly 'non-standard') timing > > parameters within the AVR hardware? > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------- > Dennis Clark TTT Enterprises > www.techtoystoday.com > ------------------------------------------------- >
Message
Re: CAN Bus - usefull for long distances of outdoor cable?
2009-09-05 by stevech11
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.