>
> that doesn't answer my question at all...
>
> also, I think a real analog filter beats soft-o-crap any time.
>
> --- In atari-midi-archives @yahoogroups. com, "Leighton"
> <methodman3000@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In atari-midi-archives @yahoogroups. com, "somethingkillingyo u"
> > <somethingkillingyo u@> wrote:
> > >Hi Fabio,
> > I owned a K3, K1 and K5 . The K3 is good for learning the
> > parameters of what a synthesizer does. There is a button for every
> > function. Beyond that softsynths take its place. I gave mine away
> > to someone with small kids, because it great for learning about
> > syntesizer sound making. It is not multi-timberal. Has small number
> > of routings. Very fixed routings and Crow Music has created an
> > instrument sounding exactly like what its gifts were called the Blue
> > crow.;that is virtual. So I can use several different sounding K3.
> > If you know how to think like a programmer, Why keep it? It's
> > outdated. The additive synthesis is explained by using Reaktor.
> > Samplers have developed so far. The help and tutorials to learn
> > things are cheap. I am subscribing to VTC.com for $250 a year and I
> > have access to about 35 different online Audio classes, in addition
> > photoshop, illustrator that it is cheap to become an expert in
> > anything now. So unless you are a newbie or have kids the K3 is not
> > that hot.
> >
> > Leighton
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi there
> > >
> > > I'm new here, so here's my first question :)
> > >
> > > I got a Kawai K3; you know this old synth has an additive user wave
> > > that you can determine by setting 32 harmonic partials 'non zero
> > > value' (1-31) choosable between the first 128 harmonic partials (the
> > > other 96 harmonics, unused, are 0 value by default)...
> > >
> > > of course, I'm using Dr.T's K3edit to have a quick access to it
> > (thank
> > > you!)...
> > >
> > > I'd like to use it correctly but I've no idea what I'm doing: the
> > > problem is that you cannot "see" the shape of the waveform with the
> > > program...
> > >
> > > is there an application that could help on this. i.e. a software
> > that
> > > lets you tweak at least 32 partials out of 128 (the more the better)
> > > showing you the wave-shape so that you know what you're doing?
> > >
> > > also, starting from some samples and isolating a single complete
> > > oscillation of the waveform you wanna reproduce (more or less
> > > complex), is it possible to know which harmonic partials have been
> > > used and their (approssimative) value?
> > >
> > > I have a pc, but I'm using STeem, so softwares of both platforms are
> > > welcome...
> > >
> > >
> > > greetings
> > >
> > > Fabio
> > >
> >
>