a qustion
2004-04-02 by Aaron
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:40 UTC
Thread
2004-04-02 by Aaron
Hey whats de-essing?
2004-04-02 by Ed Edwards
> Hey whats de-essing? It's an audio technique for removing fricatives from sound; the sharp part of the "s" and "c" sounds in particular. It's been around awhile... it was done in the analog domain until DSPs caught up enough to be able to handle it better digitally. And better they do -- so you've recorded a track where the singer was a bit to close to the mic and there's lots of SSSSylvessster tthe Ccat ssssoundssss in the mixxxx. A de-esser, when properly adjusted, can do amazing things to clean this kinda stuff up. HTH Ed Edwards Leader: Ezekiel's Wheel \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffdRetro-Progressive Rock\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd http://www.untiedmusic.com/ezekiel http://ezekielswheel.com \ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd
2004-04-02 by James Acker
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Edwards" > > Hey whats de-essing? > > It's an audio technique for removing fricatives from sound; the sharp part > of the "s" and "c" sounds in particular. It's been around awhile... it was > done in the analog domain until DSPs caught up enough to be able to handle > it better digitally. And better they do -- so you've recorded a track where > the singer was a bit to close to the mic and there's lots of SSSSylvessster > tthe Ccat ssssoundssss in the mixxxx. A de-esser, when properly adjusted, > can do amazing things to clean this kinda stuff up. HTH > > Ed Edwards On the flipside...there is a tradeoff (if it isn't adjusted optimally) in that you loose some highs. Being no sound engineer genius, I tend to go lightly on the de-essing. If I knew more I probably could get away with more of it, but just to point out, the BEST is always to try and get the mic'ing right, so there is no need of filtering afterwards. Generally, you want to avoid signal processing, unless you are going for effect or to fix small problems. I keep getting amazed at some of the recording nresgroups, where you have guys willing to go through a whole 5 minute song, minutely adjusting and editing waveforms to get rid of guitar string squeeks, "esses" in vocals, pick noise...etc. Instead of doing it again :-) Jim
2004-04-02 by Ed Edwards
> I keep getting amazed at some of the recording nresgroups, where > you have guys willing > to go through a whole 5 minute song, minutely adjusting and > editing waveforms to get rid > of guitar string squeeks, "esses" in vocals, pick noise...etc. > Instead of doing it again :-) Hmm, "Doing it again."? Not sure that's relevant anymore. I think it's even kinda obsolete when experiencing the studio work I've been around lately. I am suspect of 98.6% of stuff I hear today isn't human. Even "live" recordings get massaged, painted up and even Frankensteined. Ed Edwards Leader: Ezekiel's Wheel \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffdRetro-Progressive Rock\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd http://www.untiedmusic.com/ezekiel http://ezekielswheel.com \ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd.\ufffd\ufffd