RE: Digest Number 386(AN200)
2001-04-11 by tspeer
Thank you, Jack Handy (RODGER) for enlightening me. I'm sure I CAN play a 6 note chord on a 5 note synth- since you pointed out my "own creative shortcomings" keep me from doing so (or was it my "projection"). Sometimes it can be a relief sharing your observations about a product that falls short of what you've come to expect from a company who have made incredible tools- in an effort to gain knowledge and insight from others (who are not arm chair psychologists) and provide feedback to said company. Having spent years typing out hex code on an Ensoniq Mirage, Adding sample silence to 8bit waveforms on an Amiga to loop the waves and get a digital delay, Milking PWM sounds out of a CZ-101, and making EPS Wavetables to mimic the PPG I could not afford, I have some idea how to work around limitations, Yet I reserve the right to call technical boundaries when I see them ( a rose is a rose by any other name ). -OK... vent mode off (sorry for the rant Rodger - but you baited me too well- no offense is meant). It appears the Engine inside the AN200 is much more than what's on offer on its' Spartan front panel (Exactly how much of the AN1x is actually in there ?). - Even so- I believe $500 is still a bit steep. I think $300 would tempt me (with software access to the engine). Todd S ;) > From: Rodger Werkhoven <rwerkhoven@...> > Subject: RE: Digest Number 386 > > I guess sometimes it can be a relief projecting your own creative > shortcomings on (non or very accessible) tools, tools that in the end are > 'just' tools... waiting to be pushed to your own creative boundaries, not > theirs or the boundaries of their creators. > > RODGER > > >> HAHHAHAHA, those damn whacky kids.....gotta love'm >> >> ash >> >> >>> Hell- Why didn't they just add more flashing lights and an >>> "Beam-control"- the kids would come running... >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
