The Yamaha AN1x Synthesizer mailing list group photo

Yahoo Groups archive

The Yamaha AN1x Synthesizer mailing list

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:40 UTC

Message

Re: [AN1x-list] Wishlist for a new AN1x

2000-05-22 by tomfinegan@yahoo.com

> - Peter--- In AN1x-list@egroups.com, Peter Korsten <peterk@i...>
wrote:
> tomfinegan@y... shared with us:
> >
> > What do you think?
> I think there's already a shitload (pardon my French) of virtual
> analogue synthesisers. Are we really waiting for yet another one?
Hm, that´s sad and so true, but companies keep making new models.

Supernova II and Nova II, Virus Rack and Indigo, TBS Mephisto, Jomox
Sunsyn, Oberheim OB12, Korg MS2000/r, Waldorf Micro-Q, Nordlead 3 and
all the countless numbers of softsynths.

For me it seems that there is still a big market for VA´s. So why
wouldn´t Yamaha try to get a piece of the cake as well? But maybe
you
are right and the market will be soon fed up.

But also i am still wondering, if i look at the S80/CS6x, was the
market really in the need for another ROMpler? They just did it,
despite all Kurzweil´s K2500´s, Alesis QS´, Roland´s
JV/XV´s, Korg
Trinity´s and Triton´s, GEM Equinox´s.

> And as I understand it, the strongest point of the AN1x is not the
> sound, but the whole package with effects, keyboard, etcetera.
You mean for that low price it is strong?

Well, i like the sound of the AN1x, in my ears it´s different from
any other VA´s. It has it´s own unique sound. If we would go
only for
the extra features, i guess we all would end up with a Supernova or a
Virus kb.
IMO Yamaha-engineers are able to improve the sound-quality of their
AN and to present (yes) another VA, but at least with it´s unique
sound, uncomparable to all Virus´ and Qows.

> If we compare the CS1x and CS2x, there wasn't much improvement. I'm
> afraid that a AN2x would be
> something similar... nothing spectacular.
That´s why i am hoping to see a AN6x or AN8x...

Regards, Tom

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.