AFAIK Yamaha actually quote Aphex in their blurb somewhere, so, I would have thought that they are authorized users of the name. In article <l03130303b835bc7f9ff3@[66.108.109.223]>, Mike B (digiboy) <digiboy@...> writes >>Hello, No it's not unique to Yamaha, Aphex actually made the original I >> >>think you will find. I can't tell you exactly how it works, but from >> >>what I understand it 'adds' some frequencies that the brain is >> >>particularly drawn to and finds it hard to ignore (apparently babies >> >>crying and women screaming also produce this frequency!), not sure what >> >>else it does. > >So is Aural Exciter a copyrighted name? Aphex is still very much in the >business . >Doesn't Aphex have any kind of control over the use of the term "Aural >Exciter" in the same fashion that Dolby owns the rights to that term for >it's noise reduction circuits. Does this mean the Yammy is actually using >the authorized Aphex effect system? I've seen other companies refer to >effects they call "audio Enhancers" and other such terms that imply the >same result but are surely not the same as the Aphex system. > >Mike Berman >digiboy@... > > > > > > >Community email addresses: > Post message: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com > Subscribe: AN1x-list-subscribe@yahoogroups.com > Unsubscribe: AN1x-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > List owner: AN1x-list-owner@yahoogroups.com > >Shortcut URL to this page: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AN1x-list > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > See ya, Reggie
Message
Re: [AN1x-list] Aural Exciter
2001-12-07 by Reggie