Gary Gregson wrote:
explains the stability of Win2000, there are other things than Windoze
and MacOS have you ever heard about realtime kernel like BeOS and
rtlinux for exanple? Hi-Performace Fileformats like BeFS and ReiserFS?
The way I see it theres a lot more to come.
Regards
Joergen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Peter wrote:Hello the Win2000 and WinNT is also based on a old Unix kernel, and that
> >>
> Pro audio software running on Unix, now that's another story. :) But
> the
> fact that Unix (actually, Mach and BSD) are the basis of MacOS X made
> my
> decision to move from Windows to MacOS.
> <<
>
> The jury is definitely still out on MacOS X...it may be built on UNIX
> but
> its still a relatively unproven product, and it includes a lot of
> legacy
> support that may prove to be problematic. Still, It will be
> interesting to
> see how it performs over the coming months. I am still on MacOS 9 and
> my Mac
> is fairly old (A PowerMac 8500 upgraded to a G3). So I guess I will be
>
> looking for some new hardware before moving to MacOS X. Hopefully by
> then
> the bugs will have been shaken out a little :-)
>
> Until then I am more than happy to use Win2K for my primary system.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Gary Gregson
explains the stability of Win2000, there are other things than Windoze
and MacOS have you ever heard about realtime kernel like BeOS and
rtlinux for exanple? Hi-Performace Fileformats like BeFS and ReiserFS?
The way I see it theres a lot more to come.
Regards
Joergen
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
