Hi Reggie, Lets not confuse MIDI v2.0 with Open MIDI Plugin System (OMPS). MIDI v2.0 is likely to be an enhancement to the transmission protocol. Basically this will change the recommended Media (i.e. moving from the 31.25Kbits/s serial cable to 1394 bus at 400Mbits/s or more) and enhance the actual protocol (i.e. break the 16 channel/port limit, 7bit/data limit and add reliable time stamping). All of this is well overdue and therefore thoroughly welcome. Yamaha appear to be at the forefront of this technology with their mLan proposals. [its worth noting that the article referenced in Jons post, highlights the technical problems associated with the current crop of USB devices. There have been several discussions on the reliability of USB devices within the AN1x forum. During those discussions I have never been an advocate of MIDI over USB. So I find it refreshing to see an independent article that lays down the facts. Hopefully this will encourage more manufacturers to move to 1394 solutions and to stop pushing USB solutions that for the most part do not work reliably under stress] OMPS on the other hand does not affect the MIDI spec in any way. It is simply a software plugin format (similar to DirectX or VST plugins for audio). I have been working with Yamaha/Microsoft/Cakewalk on this format. The aim is really to allow the MIDI functionality of sequencer products to be enhanced by third party plugin components (So for instance third parties can provide device editors, enhanced edit views, MIDI processors and other MIDI data manipulation functions as simple plugins to existing sequencer software). This will deliver timely support for new devices/MIDI formats etc to end users within their chosen sequencing environments. OMPS can also potentially deliver more flexible softsynths than are currently possible under VST. This does not mean OMPS is intended as a replacement for VST....its more of a complimentary technology. So for example in future, it may be possible for me to provide editors similar to XGedit/AN1xEdit that run directly within your sequencer.....no more Hubi cables or device conflicts etc and no need to export data to MIDI etc for transfer to your sequencer. Instead the editor would be capable of directly reading and writing the sequencers tracks, automating from playback data and sending data directly via the sequencers MIDI ports. Really the only tie in between OMPS and MIDI v2.0 is that OMPS has been specified so as to be extensible and can accommodate larger numbers of channels/higher data widths than the current MIDI specification. The good news is ....that contrary to popular belief....MIDI is not dead! For some time MIDI has appeared to be the poor relation to Audio technologies as far as development is concerned. However with these recent developments MIDI will get some of the attention it deserves and continue to be a relevant factor in music production. Regards Gary Gregson Email:gary@... http://www.yme.co.uk/yme
Message
RE: [AN1x-list] OT: Article on IEEE-1394, mLAN, USB, OMS, MIDI v2.0 etc.
2001-03-17 by Gary Gregson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.