No man we're all learning from you...thanks ! Don't stop. Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards, Bastiaan van de Werk ----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Wahler <bruce@...> To: <AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 4:10 PM Subject: Re: SV: SV: [AN1x-list] FM synthesis (long post) > Jim, > > >I still need to wrap my head around the syncing of vc01 and vc02, why one > >would chose one over the other for master-slave.. > > In principle, it doesn't matter which wave is the slave for syncing, but in > practice, once a VCO is selected, the waveforms of the two VCOs can be > pruned to include only the most musically useful ones. It may simplify the > design, which usually translates into a cost savings. > > >One thing especially...when some of the algorithms have an option called > >"fixed" does that effectively turn the option off...out of the picture? > > Fixed doesn't turn syncing off; it just fixes the frequency of the slave > oscillator. If we look at how syncing works, the master oscillator 'says,' > "Look, the slave oscillator can do anything it likes, frequency-wise, but > every time I reach the start of my waveform (0 degrees), I'm going to force > the slave back to 0 degrees, too." This is a kind of modulation, and like > other modulation types, results in a wave that has frequency components of > both the carrier and modulator. IMHO, fixed-frequency syncing is less > musically interesting than variable-frequency syncing, just like a sine > wave is less musically interesting than a sawtooth -- but that's a > generalization. Both sines and fixed syncing have their use, musically. > > >I assume you've been here longer, and know about the list...but for the > >short time I've been here I have seen mail form other novices and I can't > >believe they would want to miss out on this kind of good explanation of > >theory, about one of the central modules. > > Actually, I've only been on the list for about 2 1/2 weeks. My advantages > are: a) I'm an electrical engineer whose specialty is analog electronics; > and b) I was fortunate enough to go to a college in the mid-70s where I had > access to a Minimoog, a Putney VCS3, and a Buchla. The access to > non-programmed, analog synths means that I had to learn how to do things > from scratch, rather than depend on a library of sounds created by the > manufacturer. A pain in the butt then; a clear advantage now. When I > first got the AN1x, I spent a week of, "Wow! You mean you can sync the > VCOs to LFO1, and still have VCO2 left over???" and such. > > >I certainly can take it off line...but isn't the purpose of this list to > >discuss exactly this kind of thing? Have most of the people here already > >been through this? > > A good question for the group: Was my explanation to Jim useful to others, > or was it a case of, "Oh no! Not another round of synth theory!" I'm a > relative newbie here, so a poll might be in order. > > >(by the way..any idea of the number of listers?) > > ~400 > > > Regards, > > -BW > > -- > Bruce Wahler > Design Consultant > Ashby Solutions" > www.ashbysolutions.com > CloneWheel Support Group moderator > 978.386.7389 voice > 978.776.0096 fax > bruce@... > > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com > Subscribe: AN1x-list-subscribe@yahoogroups.com > Unsubscribe: AN1x-list-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > List owner: AN1x-list-owner@yahoogroups.com > > Shortcut URL to this page: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AN1x-list > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >
Message
Re: SV: SV: [AN1x-list] FM synthesis (long post)
2001-03-10 by Bastiaan van de Werk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
