Jim, >I still need to wrap my head around the syncing of vc01 and vc02, why one >would chose one over the other for master-slave.. In principle, it doesn't matter which wave is the slave for syncing, but in practice, once a VCO is selected, the waveforms of the two VCOs can be pruned to include only the most musically useful ones. It may simplify the design, which usually translates into a cost savings. >One thing especially...when some of the algorithms have an option called >"fixed" does that effectively turn the option off...out of the picture? Fixed doesn't turn syncing off; it just fixes the frequency of the slave oscillator. If we look at how syncing works, the master oscillator 'says,' "Look, the slave oscillator can do anything it likes, frequency-wise, but every time I reach the start of my waveform (0 degrees), I'm going to force the slave back to 0 degrees, too." This is a kind of modulation, and like other modulation types, results in a wave that has frequency components of both the carrier and modulator. IMHO, fixed-frequency syncing is less musically interesting than variable-frequency syncing, just like a sine wave is less musically interesting than a sawtooth -- but that's a generalization. Both sines and fixed syncing have their use, musically. >I assume you've been here longer, and know about the list...but for the >short time I've been here I have seen mail form other novices and I can't >believe they would want to miss out on this kind of good explanation of >theory, about one of the central modules. Actually, I've only been on the list for about 2 1/2 weeks. My advantages are: a) I'm an electrical engineer whose specialty is analog electronics; and b) I was fortunate enough to go to a college in the mid-70s where I had access to a Minimoog, a Putney VCS3, and a Buchla. The access to non-programmed, analog synths means that I had to learn how to do things from scratch, rather than depend on a library of sounds created by the manufacturer. A pain in the butt then; a clear advantage now. When I first got the AN1x, I spent a week of, "Wow! You mean you can sync the VCOs to LFO1, and still have VCO2 left over???" and such. >I certainly can take it off line...but isn't the purpose of this list to >discuss exactly this kind of thing? Have most of the people here already >been through this? A good question for the group: Was my explanation to Jim useful to others, or was it a case of, "Oh no! Not another round of synth theory!" I'm a relative newbie here, so a poll might be in order. >(by the way..any idea of the number of listers?) ~400 Regards, -BW -- Bruce Wahler Design Consultant Ashby Solutions" www.ashbysolutions.com CloneWheel Support Group moderator 978.386.7389 voice 978.776.0096 fax bruce@...
Message
Re: SV: SV: [AN1x-list] FM synthesis (long post)
2001-03-10 by Bruce Wahler
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.