Sorry Peter I meant Marlin I know theres not much difference between a sampler and a synth, but there IS a difference between sampling an arpegio and playing/programming one yourself. ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Korsten <peterk@...> To: <AN1x-list@egroups.com> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 9:05 PM Subject: Re: [AN1x-list] Commercial Trance > Paul Murphy shared with us: > > This thread seems to have gone off the track. > > Yes, well, it's the bane of this list, I 'spose... > > > Let me go back to a statement made by Peter : > > > > " Are you nuts??? Commercial trance producers do NOT use sampling-cds for > > creating arpeggios!!!!! > > It is impossible to create authentic dynamic filter modulation with > > it!!! " > > Wasn't me. :) (But that's been covered already.) > > > I was actually agreeing with his statement, saying that if you desire these > > sort of trance arpeggios, you wouldn't sample CD's because you would be > > restricted to the notes and dynamic filter effects that were applied to the > > original sample. > > > > Buying an actual synth would be a better option for this application because > > you could construct the arpeggios you want with the effects you want. > > The way I see it, it would be a better option to use a different > sample, then. > > There really isn't much difference between synths like the AN1x > and the A-series samplers. The oscillators differ - and that's it. > Both rely on the substractive synthesis method, which basically > means they both use filters to make the sound interesting. > > - Peter > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: AN1x-list@onelist.com > Subscribe: AN1x-list-subscribe@onelist.com > Unsubscribe: AN1x-list-unsubscribe@onelist.com > List owner: AN1x-list-owner@onelist.com > > Shortcut URL to this page: > http://www.onelist.com/community/AN1x-list >
Message
Re: [AN1x-list] Commercial Trance
2000-11-17 by Paul Murphy
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
