The question was originally to Jan (Pergamon) as he was claiming that the JP8000 was just better, but not providing insight or substance as to why he thought it was better. I was simply curious as to why he thought the way he did. Cheers, Philip P.S. I'm finally getting off my lazy butt and contributing some new sounds to the list, probably this weekend. --- tomfinegan@... wrote: > --- In AN1x-list@egroups.com, "Pergamon" > <pergamon@g...> wrote: > > > > > --- In AN1x-list@egroups.com, Philip > <synth72@y...> wrote: > > > > Care to back that up with substance as to why > it's a > > > > better synth? All you've said is that it's > better, but > > > > not why it's better. I'm not trying to start > an > > > > arguement. I'm just curious as to what you see > in it > > > > that makes it "better". > > > > The question here was intended for me, not the > "dude" that spammed > this list, just to promote himself. > Oh, you are right, sorry, i thought that Philip were > asking > the "Dude" and not you. > > Regards, Tom > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
Message
Re: Sv: Sv: Sv: [AN1x-list] Jp 8000/8080
2000-08-16 by Philip
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.
