--- In AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com, Jeff <jf.serviere@...> wrote:
Regardless of anyone's opinion, 'perfect' filters are indeed _extremely_ important in "the real world" for many people in many professions who need the most accurate possible filtering of signals or data.
That's not the same as saying you have a preference for characterful imperfections in filters, like the famous ones in the Moog for example.
>I must assume you are referring to synthesis only, and stating your personal opinion that 'perfect', or rather as close to perfect as is ever possible with current technology, does not sound good.
> IMHO the perfect filter does not belong to the real world, even analog ones
Regardless of anyone's opinion, 'perfect' filters are indeed _extremely_ important in "the real world" for many people in many professions who need the most accurate possible filtering of signals or data.
That's not the same as saying you have a preference for characterful imperfections in filters, like the famous ones in the Moog for example.