Agreed about the reluctance to produce hardware synths. My buddy plays a wind synth and that list is alive with many players who go play in venues for money with nothing but their wind synth and a laptop (and the house PA). I remember a time when people would tremble with horror when we mentioned that we used Cakewalk live to change synth patches on all our equipment. Everyone was SURE Microsoft Windows would crash. and it did sometimes. But that was 10 years ago. _____ From: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com [mailto:AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of spaceanimals Sent: Monday, November 02, 2009 9:19 AM To: AN1x-list@yahoogroups.com Subject: [AN1x] AN1X vs AAS Ultra VA I went nuts last week and bought a virtual analog vst plugin. I found some things were very nice about computer synths, mainly getting all the lfos, effects, etc to sync with the music. The VST sounds more like a real analog synthesizer. I personally like the AN1X sound better, but I haven't explored the VST synth in depth. I know how to use the ribbon controller on the AN1X which gives it a huge advantage. I suppose I will have to trudge through the owner's manual and learn how to use the controller on the VST. Also, although there are plugin amp simulators, the AN1X through a low watt tube amp and a 2X12 cabinet is a glorious sound. Given that the plugin was marked down to $15.00 it's easy to see why companies might be reluctant to put hardware synths on the market. Rainbow Jimmy No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.39/2469 - Release Date: 11/01/09 19:39:00 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [AN1x] AN1X vs AAS Ultra VA
2009-11-02 by Ed Edwards
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.