200e

On Jun 5, 2009, at 4:10 PM, fhserge wrote:
> any further explanation on your side? Would be happy to be  
> enlightened on that matter...

so your original email was about "complete patch storage". you  
mentioned the limited number of cv and audio outs on the 210e and  
questioned getting a second one.

my answer was sort of in jest. in my usage patterns i hardly ever  
setup patches with only 5 audio / cv routings. even with certain hard- 
coded setups (all my 281e outputs shorted to 292e inputs, all the 292e  
ouputs into all the 227e inputs, etc) i need more than 5 extra cables  
to recall a preset.  so then getting a second (or a third!) 210e seems  
like a solution but eventually i'm dealing with so many outputs / 
inputs on those modules that i need some sort of module to simplify  
them. hence, one more 210e.

i think it's a losing battle to truly come up with a system of presets  
that solely uses the 210e and doesn't require manual patching around  
unless you've only get 2 or 3 modules (and even then, really hard).

thanks,

-jon
"There are no differences but differences of degree between different  
degrees
of difference and no difference."
- James, William. "Subjective Effects of Nitrous Oxide." Mind. 1882;  
Vol 7.