hi ezra! i realize i have said this before but it is important enough to me to vote again again that i agree very much that a larger dead zone would be sad times. -- damon On May 31, 2009, at 1:27 PM, ezra buchla wrote: > > > these are separate issues. > > 1) the FM offset is a calibrationthing; flashing the firmware > should force a > recalibration but it's important not to touch the module for a few > minutes > after flashing. > > 2) the firmware does indeed impose a dead zone on the mod index, > but it may > be a little left or right of the detent. i'm not actually sure why > that is, > to be honest. if we make the dead zone larger, some users find it > extremely > annoying... > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 3:57 AM, kai200e <kai200e@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com <200e%40yahoogroups.com>, "Heath Finnie" > > <heathfinnie@...> wrote: > > > > > > On my two 261e's, I noticed with one of them the FM input will > lower the > > pitch with nothing plugged into the jack as I increase the knob > and the > > other one will have no effect unless something is actually > plugged into the > > jack...? > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > > > > Heath > > > > > > > Hi Heath, > > > > i do have the same problem. CV in does the same. I think the > reason why is > > because the Poti does have a middle raster hole but does not have > a dead > > zone. > > > > So as soon you will jack something in for example cv (primal) the > OSC will > > get modulated. Even if the Poti is in the middle grid postion. > > > > I´m not sure but i think this coud be fix with a software upgrade. > > > > kai > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > >
Message
Re: [200e] Re: One more question about OSC FM input...
2009-05-31 by damon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.