200e

re. reverb -- I am regularly amazed at the reverberatory quality that  
can come out of various patches of 200e modules. the buchla creates  
its own sonic space.


On 20-Nov-08, at 2:09 PM, kkonkkrete wrote:

>
> Here's an idea for a new module that would help people building  
> smaller systems:
> Top half would be the top half of the 255, bottom half would be the  
> bottom half of
> the 256e. That would handle both 'flavours' of CV processing in a  
> single panel, albeit
> in lesser quantities. Sort of the same philosophy as the 206e:  
> combining elements of
> the 225e and 227e in a single compact panel.
>
> I would also love to see some form of delay and spring reverb module  
> (I can imagine
> these squeezed together into a single panel, kind of like the 190 or  
> 275, but with
> some kind of Wilson Analogue Delay or something of that ilk in there  
> too). As it
> stands, I think that is the biggest basic sonic element missing from  
> the 200e
> compared to previous B&A systems.
>
> Having said this, I also wholeheartedly support Don Buchla coming up  
> with whatever
> the hell he feels like to pursue his own singular vision of the  
> instrument!
>
> --- In 200e@yahoogroups.com, joe Pascarell <buchlajoe@...> wrote:
> >
> > ahhh. the 255 .... a wonderful module ...... i love it ...
> >
> > --- On Mon, 11/17/08, Dhymitruy Bouryiotis <da108@...> wrote:
> > From: Dhymitruy Bouryiotis <da108@...>
> > Subject: Re: [200e] Re: new 200e modules
> > To: 200e@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Monday, November 17, 2008, 7:02 PM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I just ordered a 255 -- I liked reading that word "beautiful" next  
> to
> >
> > it...
> >
> >
> >
> > On 17-Nov-08, at 3:13 PM, cuari7 wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Yes, you're right about this. But it would still be wonderful to  
> have
> >
> > > the option of a few non preset-devoted modules (like the beautiful
> >
> > > 255)
> >
> > > for those of us who are not interested in saving module settings.
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Now, switching gears toward the 24-module cabinet option: this  
> would
> >
> > > certainly be a fantastic option for some of us with this bad  
> case of
> >
> > > buchlaholism. Think of how beautiful it would look!!
> >
> > >
> >
> > > jd
> >
> > >
> >
> > > --- In 200e@yahoogroups. com, "ezra buchla" <ezra.buchla@ ...>  
> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > i do not concur
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > presets dude
> >
> > > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]