i'd like to be able to get longer envelopes from the 281e also. the current behavior, where modulated ramp times saturate at 10 seconds, seems like a mistake. its on my list but my list is long. On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 10:22 AM, mritenburg <mritenburg@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm not responding to take issue with your opinions. Your opinions are > valid as yours. I would, however, like to point out that 24 minute > envelopes (12 minute rise/12 minute fall) are possible on the 249 and > 16 minute on the 250. These times are potentially much longer when > multiplied by an external voltage. > >> 281e's lowest frequency (when used as an lfo) is not low enough for >> the kinds of slow, evolving drones I sometimes aim for. I also would >> like to have a voltage mixer/attenuator that would allow me fine, >> continuous scaling (instead of the stepped, coarse attenuation we get >> from the 210e or the 256e). > >
Message
Re: [200e] Longer envelope duration (Was: 261e or 259e capable of higher frequencies?)
2008-09-29 by ezra buchla