Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: New Digital Mellotron

From: "ClayE" <ecclesreinson@rogers.com>
Date: 2010-07-26

It depends on the D -> A converter used. 16 bit can sound shitty with a run-of-the-mill DA converter. IMHO.

Clay

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "feline1973" <feline1@...> wrote:
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, lsf5275@ wrote:
> >
> > Those are 16 bit samples, not 24 bit samples. They are also not the
> > complete sets of Mellotron and Chamberlin sounds.
>
>
> Are you sure? I know David Kean, when he made the Pindertron CD, sampled things at 32kHz 16bit, but that was a zillion years ago when Windows 3.1 was probably cutting edge and George Bush Snr was still in charge. Or something.
>
> In any case, a bit depth of 16 bit is perfect for capturing a single sound source (and gives a dynamic range hugely greater than the mellotron tapes in any case)... it's only when you start multi-tracking and mixing lots and lots of tracks and sources in a DAW that they realise you need 24 bit (or 32 bit float)
>