Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: New Digital Mellotron

From: djacques@csulb.edu
Date: 2010-07-25

True. But were they "satisfied" with what was provided with the production tapes? If so, why so much processing, double tracking, and reverb? Why did Pinder change to a solid state preamp to get a mellower sound (the Moody sound)?

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

From: tronbros <tronbros@aol.com>
Sender: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:12:48 +0100
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com<newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
ReplyTo: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: New Digital Mellotron

 

I don't think they thought about it as they wouldn't have been aware of what had gone on to create the recordings. They would have accepted what was provided with no thought to what could have been. I listen to CDs and vinyl in complete ignorance of what was originally recorded.

Best,

M

mellotronics.co.uk

On 25 Jul 2010, at 16:01, David Jacques <djacques@csulb.edu> wrote:

> How much doctoring did bands such as Genesis, King Crimson, and The Moody Blues use when recording the Mellotron to mask these degrations?