| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
It is a risky, irresponsible thing fo Markus to do. It is bad for business all around. It is publishable business news. It hurts David directly. Any mainstream help investment etc will be strictly old school tie or dads friends for everybody at this point until this goes away.
From a Wharton business school perspective, the best way to solve this is to do a pr and court blitz on Markus and drag David in to accelerate the legal costs overall. The first day would cost $60k overall roughly, Whoever is incorporated in the US/Canada pays the most.On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Bob Snyder <bob.snyder@cox. net> wrote:It begs the question whether you have attempted to ask Markus yourself
and if so, what the response was. And if not, why?
Bob S.
tronbros@aol. com wrote:
>
>
> We too like David and get on perfectly well with him. We don't want
> any confrontation but it seems to me(us) that it is absurd for Markus
> to name a product so closely after a competitors product that it's
> either stupidity or a measured act of what exactly?.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
>