Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: NAMM Report

From: Hessel Herder <hessel@soundscape.nl>
Date: 2010-01-15

Not sure about interest in the vintage/ tape-based machines dropping because of Resch's product,I don't think one will exclude the other.Apples and oranges


Op 15 jan 2010 om 19:52 heeft "Mattias Olsson" <Mattias.olsson5@comhem.se> het volgende geschreven:\

 

I think...if it sounds and feels like a Mellotron with 100 sounds and its portable...I think a lot of people would be interested.
 
It could actually not only affect the memotron but the whole used market as well.
 
Buying a Chamberlin M1 for 7000 dollars wont really make as much sense anymore...
 
But keep it a secret...
 
// Mattias
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: [newmellotrongroup] Re: NAMM Report

 

If true, Memotron is done for.  Markus will hit  a home run if pricing is that low.

From: newmellotrongroup@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:newmellotro ngroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djacques@csulb. edu
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 1:32 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: NAMM Report

 

Its a lot lower than that.

Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

From: "Tron400" <kornowicz@cox. net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:48:51 -0000
To: <newmellotrongroup@ yahoogroups. com>
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: NAMM Report

 



I'd be surprised if it was that cheap. Didn't someone post $2700? That seems more likely, but even that could be low.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@ yahoogroups. com, lsf5275@... wrote:
>
> I think someone posted $1,600-$1,900. 00
>