previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
>--
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>, Mike Dickson
> <mike.dickson@...> wrote:
> >It would appear that it's not the quality of the samples that's
> always the issue, but the way in which they are processed.
> >
> > Mike
>
> Should the samples be converted to digital and not processed at all,
> or should they just be processed carefully?
>
> All of the current digital mellotron sample libraries were produced
> with 16 bit editors (or lower). Over-processing can hose-up 16 bit
> samples quickly.
>
> It would be good to hear mellotron samples recorded with 24 bit gear
> and done with minimal processing.
>
> Clay
>
>