Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotron film in London...

From: Chris Dale <unobtainiumkeys@gmail.com>
Date: 2009-09-27

Thanks Frank!
 
 
Mattias - This is not intended as a dig at you in any way. 
 
I'm rather surprised you'd think you were being lumped in with the type of mentality I'm talking about.
 
I mean - are you young in your maturity, insecure, ego centered, have a desire to over-promote yourself in the media, dishonestly pass samples off as real "mellotron" in liner notes to enhance CD sales, pretend you own a mellotron when you don't, take credit for things others have done before you, or not have the class to know when to censure youself ?
 
I'd like to believe "no".  You've made some intelligent contributions here, have you not? 
 
 
About me having heard your music - you were supposed to send me a CD a while back while we were discussing the "possible Chamberlin for sale" thread. But you never did......... so I don't know quite what it sounds like, and am in no position to comment on it.
 
So - in no way could I be referring to you, nor other list members here, or any other mellotron caretakers. And if I was, I would be a hypocrite - as my age and perceived disposition could also include me in the "Johnny come lately" demographic as well.
 
But I try my best to ensure that never happens. (When is the last time I drew attention to my own projects here or anywhere else?)
 
 
So please don't misconstrue what I'm ranting about (and you really probably shouldn't have posted my words out of context on Facebook - but no big deal)
 
Anyway - my rant - specifically - is about newer and immature bands using mellotron samples (or borrowed real mellotron) and blathering on endlessly in interviews about how interesting their band is over others, or how much they love the sound (said more really for their own publicity) - and....... that this kind of "interview"  is really a veiled "band promo" or "product placement" and should probably be kept to a minimum  - specifically in Dianna's movie......
 
 
WHY?......
 
 
Because there is a lot of untold history that hasn't been getting out there, and that needs to get out there.....and it can only be told with any credibility by those who were there during the golden age and who were interviewed for this film.
 
If this wasn't the case - I would be more than happy to hear "insert post- modern bands name here" on how special or interesting they think they are because they use real mellotron or samples.
 
But this isn't what's happening these days....
 
We hear the same trivial information repeated in books, film, video, the internet etc, and other more important and historical things that we have wondered about on this list are being forgotten about.
 
 
As far I'm aware - filling this void was one of the goals of Dianna's film, - to uncover some untold history. This was also a condition for certain people in agreeing to be interviewed in the first place. As a matter of fact - I was the guy who had to persuade some of these "elders" to do it, to freely discuss as much info as they did.
 
So yes, admittedly I have a personal interest in hearing the likes of John Bradley, Richard Chamberlin, Geoff Unwin, Dave Biro, Frank Levi, John Kasche, Bill Eberline, etc. over everyone else in the movie. 
 
And in my opinion, it would be a bloody shame to see their "unheard of before contributions" edited down to promote say -  the likes of Chris Dale, Mattias, Jon Brion, Opeth, the Flower Kings, Kanye West or anyone else - because this stuff can be found elsewhere and the other info can't.
 
The only others who could probably remedy this void at any length are Dave Kean, Martin Smith, Jerry Korb, Marcus Resch, and Pea Hix.  
 
 
Dianna's film seems an excellent opportunity for us to learn some unknown history (which I know we all would find very interesting) and I sincerely hope enough of it survives the final cut. I imagine it will if she has or had total control over the editing.
 
 
 
So to sum up  - if it's a hypothetical choice between learning about: 
 
 
Category 1:
 
 
Barry Frederick - first Chamberlin session musician
Harry Chamberlin's early recording equipment
The special room Harry created to record in
Lawrence Welk's offer to fund Chamberlin manufacture
Bill Fransen's false residence 
Harry's selling of the violin sound to Streetly
Geoff Unwin's Mellotron promotion
Story of  Yamaha / Wurlitzer adding the instrument plastic tabs to their organs to spitefully compete with the Chamberlin
Frank Levi correcting Bill Eberline's Sound Sales "modifications"
John Lennon's Birotron order / music session at the Record Plant
McCartney visit to the Birotron factory
Harry's lawsuits / deal with Optigan Corporation
Dave Vankoevering's attempted deal with Roy Chilton
Musician's Union ban and destruction of tape replay instruments
Pepperidge Farm Foods funding of digital Birotron
Bob Moog being asked to help with Godley / Creme's Gizmo
Mellotron or Chamberlin maintenance 
 
 
or Category 2:
 
 
Kanye West's opinion of the Chamberlin
Maroon 5 and how much they like the sound
Martin Orford's complaints about the Mellotron
How Opeth uses the Mellotron
How Bigelf uses Mellotron
How Mellotron samples are replacements for the real thing
M-Tron and which bands are using it
Memo tron
How me, you , or your friends, or your friends' bands use a real mellotron and what we all think of the sound
Any overly-self promotional material
 
 
Well - no offense to anyone - but I know which category I'd find more interesting and would rather watch.  
 
Granted - there has to be a certain amount of time given to "how" and "who" uses these things now, but certainly not at the expense of necessary history which has been buried over time.
 
A film like this - such arcane material -  should be more about the history of the instruments, and less about stroking our own egos and promoting our own musical endeavors. That's what our respective websites are for.
 
In comparison, we have lots of time for our own interviews, thoughts on mellotron sounds, music promos etc.
 
The original Mellotron, Chamberlin, Birotron, Orchestron, and Optigan "elders" don't.
 
We don't know what we don't know.
 
Let's learn while we still can.
 
Mattias - hypothetically  - say you got a broken Chamberlin one day, and you found out Richard died, but before he went he recorded some repair tips  but........ they were cut from the movie - I'm sure you'd trade your spot in a heartbeat to have those bits from Richard back in. Ditto John Bradley or Dave Biro.
 
This is the kind of stuff I'm talking about - info that once it's gone - it's gone.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


 
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 5:11 PM, <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:
 

He said "Johnny come lately..." not Mattias come lately...
 
In a message dated 9/26/2009 3:03:41 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Mattias.olsson5@comhem.se writes:
Hi Chris, I am Mattias. Nice to meet you. Have you heard my band ?