Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotrons Live vs Studio

From: john barrick <astroboy@cinci.rr.com>
Date: 2009-02-05

To hell with it, I'm not going to take on all three of you.....

john



ceccles_ca wrote:
>
> I'm with Fritz and Mike on this one.....
>
> Clay
>
> > I'm with Mike on this one.....
> >
> > fritz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@...>
> > To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05 pm
> > Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Mellotrons Live vs Studio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The reason why Mellotron samples don't (usually) sound like a Mellotron
> >
> > is because people making the samples come up with their own judgements
> >
> > regarding eq, volume, pitching and the rest of it that makes it veer
> >
> > well away from the original sound. Some samplers interpolate the sounds
> >
> > (only recording every third note or so) whereas others take sounds they
> >
> > feel are 'ugly' (like the top D or second F on the flute) and
> replace it
> >
> > with the note below it pitched up by a semi tone.
> >
> >
> >
> > I /have/ sampled my Mellotron strings, choir and brass faithfully
> >
> > without making any adjustments whatsoever and I would happily defy
> >
> > anyone to tell the real instrument from the samples. My problem is not
> >
> > with the samples, it's with the samplers.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > Jon wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > > I would imagine that the multiple overdubs that the studio albums
> have
> >
> > > really dilute the raw sound of the live instrument, as do
> >
> > > the musical sensibilities of the producer. Hearing that
> >
> > > realtime audio of tape moving across heads and passing through amps
> >
> > > and speakers has an immediacy that doesn't seem to translate to
> >
> > > recording. That's why Mellotron samples don't sound like a
> >
> > > Mellotron. They sound like samples of a Mellotron.
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> > > ∗From:∗ Mark Pring <mailto:markpringnz@...>
> >
> > > ∗To:∗ newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > > <mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com>>
> >
> > > ∗Sent:∗ Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:53 AM
> >
> > > ∗Subject:∗ [newmellotrongroup] Mellotrons Live vs Studio
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Just listening to some live Moody Blues track on Last FM, well
> >
> > > actually Melancholy Man. Just got me thinking of the difference
> >
> > > between the live and studio sound of the mellotron. I much prefer
> >
> > > the live sound, not knowing much about recording, what do they do
> >
> > > them in the recording studio to take most of the life out of them?
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Mark
>