Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] King Crimson - Cirkus

From: MAinPsych@aol.com
Date: 2008-07-09

In either event, it was miked, not direct, which answers the basic question.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 1:20 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] King Crimson - Cirkus

Ian /_∗definitely ∗_/told me it was HiWatt. Mind you, he was pissed at
the time.

Mike

Rick Blechta wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Tue 08/07/08 9:54 AM , MAinPsych@aol. com sent:
>
>
> According to Ian McDonald, in The Mellotron Book, the MkII was put
> through a Marshall stack and miked.
>
> My question: Does Martin feign ignorance or is that an inborn trait?
>
> How soon we forget,
> Frank Samagaio
> San Diego CA
> owner, MkII #134 (Pindertron) / M400 #908
> author, The Mellotron Book
>
> In all the photos of that-era KC that I've seen, they're using
> HiWatt stacks (they were also endorsers of HiWatt) and this is
> what Ian told me in 2005 they used for the recording of the album.
> I can't see them using HiWatt onstage and switching to something
> else in the studio. They tried to record the album as much "off
> the floor" as they could and it seems to me that they'd just drag
> their usual equipment into the studio and play.
>
> Has anyone seen any photos that refute my claim? That could give
> this discussion a lead or two.
>
> Maybe Ian didn't remember clearly what they'd used when he talked
> to you, Frank. Being a sax player primarily, he'd probably just
> think "that bloody big amp behind me" when he was playing. In my
> experience, sax players get big johnsons discussing makes of saxes
> and what reeds and mouthpieces they like. They couldn't care less
> about amplifiers. Guitarists, on the other hand... ;)
>
> Rick
>
>
>
>