| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 5:43 AM, Tony <atm655@verizon.net> wrote:Well it sure sounds fantastic Mark!I meant the Mark II violins, but I missed it when I proof or “goof” read it.For me there is almost no such thing as “too much effects”, love my delays and such.Your post was a double treat, as I recently purchased a MicroKorg XL, and that little sucks kicks some serious butt.
TonyFrom: mellotronmadnessSent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 10:17 PMSubject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: MellotonusThanks very much Tony.
I actually used the Mark II 3 violins for this piece. The tapes came with the machine and are probably at least 20 years old but not the original tapes the machine was shipped with. The tapes aren't in great shape, well the tron isn't either, and I was surprised at how good they can sound.
Until I owned a tron I always favoured the M300a violins, try as I might I can't get the sound I want out of them, I firmly believe on no evidence whatsoever that you need an M300 to play them on. I am beginning to prefer the sound of the 3 violins.
Mark
--- In mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com, "Tony" <atm655@...> wrote:
>
> Mark that’s some of the best Mellotron work I’ve ever heard!
> Think I’ll treat myself to that tape set!
> Thanks for posting it!
> Those M300s are damned sure going in my M4000 too!
> Tony #510
>
> From: mellotronmadness
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2011 4:41 PM
> To: mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Mellotonus
>
>
> Thank you for all the kind comments.
>
> Mark
>
> --- In mailto:newmellotrongroup%40yahoogroups.com, "mellotronmadness" <markpringnz@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Mellotonus <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgFwNV1eaUs>
> >
> > Well, I enjoyed it.
> >
>