Thanks for posting the pics Andy. Do all 100 voices have the low F and F# ? Do some of them sound pitch shifted? I wouldn't think that he would have recordings of those notes for all 100 voices.
The two additional notes may not seem like a big deal, but when you need them, you need them. Sometimes the middle F just will not do it!
Clay
--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, Andy kinch <kinchmusic@...> wrote:
>
>
> For those interested, I've added some pics to the members area.
>
> Andy K
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fdoddy <fdoddy@...>
> To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 17:23
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000 D
>
>
>
>
>
> I missed the sampling rate on first read. 22.05 Fs is unacceptable. I'd rather sample at a lower bit rate than sacrifice sampling frequency. Remember the old Roland samplers? They were only 12bit ...don't know if they ever went to 16, but they sounded great...it's all about the oversampling filters.
>
>
> fritz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tron400 <tron400@...>
> To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Sep 3, 2011 8:20 am
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000 D
>
>
>
>
> Most commercial sample sets are 44 K.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, john barrick <barrickjohn262@> wrote:
> >
> > It's surprising that it's that low - I worked in television for about 20
> > years and we were doing most of our audio at 44 K.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:23 PM, tron400 <tron400@> wrote:
> >
> > > ∗∗
> > >
> > >
> > > But does batch-converting 16 bit to 24 bit improve the sound? I would think
> > > that resampling would be necessary. Also the Pinder samples were sampled at
> > > 22,050 Hz. There's lots of room for improvement there.
> > >
> > > Bernie
> > >
> > > --
> > john barrick
> >
> > ∗Leo got it right the first time∗
> > ∗then he added a second pickup and got it righter∗
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I missed the sampling rate on first read. 22.05 Fs is unacceptable. I'd rather sample at a lower bit rate than sacrifice sampling frequency. Remember the old Roland samplers? They were only 12bit ...don't know if they ever went to 16, but they sounded great...it's all about the oversampling filters.
>
>
> fritz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tron400 <tron400@...>
> To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Sep 3, 2011 8:20 am
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000 D
>
>
>
>
> Most commercial sample sets are 44 K.
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, john barrick <barrickjohn262@> wrote:
> >
> > It's surprising that it's that low - I worked in television for about 20
> > years and we were doing most of our audio at 44 K.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:23 PM, tron400 <tron400@> wrote:
> >
> > > ∗∗
> > >
> > >
> > > But does batch-converting 16 bit to 24 bit improve the sound? I would think
> > > that resampling would be necessary. Also the Pinder samples were sampled at
> > > 22,050 Hz. There's lots of room for improvement there.
> > >
> > > Bernie
> > >
> > > --
> > john barrick
> >
> > ∗Leo got it right the first time∗
> > ∗then he added a second pickup and got it righter∗
> >
>