Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: mike pinder's sound

From: djacques@csulb.edu
Date: 2008-01-24

Very interesting. Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: tronbros@aol.com

Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:30:27
To:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: mike pinder's sound


Okay...

Domestic MKIIs had a VFO(Voltage frequency ocillator)control and this gave
you a great pitch sweep downwards but not upwards. The motor pulley was
matched to the VFO range to maximise this effect. MKIIs suffered from voltage
sensitivity.

SFX MKIIs had an early CMC4 style controller to quieten the audio path and
give better control, away from voltage sensitivity. It also put a whine in
the audio just like the dreaded CMC10.

M300s were built in two different fashions. One style had pitch
control(CMC4), the other didn't.

Mike Pinder removed the top end shriek(for which MKIIs are notorious), sent
the instrument through an amp which was placed in an isolated room with a
mike(s) picking up the ensuing and already mitigated sound. He removed all
attack on the violins through careful footpedal control. He also overdubbed like
buggery using what appears to be two note inversions layer upon layer. The
resulting melange was put through an EMT plate. It took a while to perfect
and you can track the progress through the first four albums as they developed
'that' sound.

Mike Dickson is from Scotland.

M
Streetly Electronics - All Things Mellotronic

_www.mellotronics.com_ (http://www.mellotronics.com/)

US Sales East: Jimmy Moore_ JMoore6397@aol.com_
(http://JMoore6397@aol.com/)
US Sales West: Paul Cox_ pjc56@earthlink.net_ (http://pjc56@earthlink.net/)