Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos

From: "Tony" <atm655@verizon.net>
Date: 2011-07-13


Mini Moogs and Voyagers sure are heavy, and it would be money well spent to offset the cantilever effect.
Another reason a real Mellotron is better than the digital gadget, in my opinion.
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Daily
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos

 

...And your Minimoog is just going to fall right off the back!
 
   (But they will probably supply a special support bracket, at a nominal fee, for just that purpose)
 
  -Bruce D.

--- On Wed, 7/13/11, lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com> wrote:

From: lsf5275@aol.com <lsf5275@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: M4000D nice review with photos
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 6:42 AM

 
Well it isn't a real Mellotron any more than a Memotron is.
 
 
In a message dated 7/13/2011 7:07:12 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, tron400@yahoo.com writes:
 


"The machine is built by Markus Resch, who also build real Mellotrons since 1999 (Mark VI & VII)."

That's a strange statement. It's like they're saying the M4000D isn't a real Mellotron.

Bernie

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Charles" <charel196@...> wrote:
>
> http://balduin.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/mellotron-m4000d/
>