| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:05 PM, John McNamara <jfranmac@gmail.com> wrote:perhaps because she has too much work to get done on her pc!
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:There is evil amongst us…..we must use the force.
….we must never distract Fritz from his self-manipulation (why do you think his wife allows it? J)!!
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of fdoddy@aol.com
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OK. Here is a tune from the same album
I'm happy to convert y'all to THE DARK SIDE.
fritz
-----Original Message-----
From: John McNamara <jfranmac@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sun, Jun 5, 2011 10:36 am
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OK. Here is a tune from the same album
ha ha! keep up the educating of us pc guys, cause i cant get past the front end of a mac .....yet...;)
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 10:32 AM, <fdoddy@aol.com> wrote:
My wife allows me to "manipulate it" at least once a day...:>)
Thankfully my computer is the servant and works to understand me rather than the opposite and yes, all the ugly stuff is hidden from me as I am not a programmer, with the exception of being a newbie on Max for Live. What it does allow me to do is run well over 120 tracks of audio from an 8 year old 1.25ghz x2 G4 without ever freezing. My 8 core at work has let me stream at least 128 tracks of VI's along with gobs of audio, all sprayed heavily with goops of plugins. If I need a Windows program, well, I just boot it up. It appears to me that Mr Gates' software runs pretty well on Mr Job's machines, even faster in my very subjective and non-techy view.
The battery on my wife's HP laptop runs a long time :>)
fritz
-----Original Message-----
From: john.mcnamara65 <jfranmac@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>Sent: Sun, Jun 5, 2011 9:42 am
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OK. Here is a tune from the same album
So Fritz..... Your computer.....does it allow you to manipulate and understand it, or is all that ugly stuff hidden or locked away from you? ; )
--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, fdoddy@... wrote:
>
>
> ooh! I'm always up for a good mac vs PC fight!
>
>
> fritz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John McNamara <jfranmac@...>
> To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sun, Jun 5, 2011 1:17 am
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sorry. I was just hoping for a nasty fight. I will try the aac format, but im not an apple fan. So thats one strike....
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Gary Brumm <gabru@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There is nothing to fight about….both formats work fine but some people may have to load iTunes
> to play AAC files. Everyone can play mp3s. If I am wrong I am sure someone will correct me. J
>
>
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 10:05 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Cc: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
>
>
>
>
>
> Please fight this out and let me pick through the entrails : )
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:55 AM, Gary Brumm <gabru@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AAC may sound a bit brighter at lower encoding rates but at higher rates the is little or no difference. The mp3 format is
> more universal and renders a smaller file size.
>
>
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 8:41 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
>
>
>
>
>
> i'll have to check if audacity/lame supports that. hey, i'll try it...
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:28 PM, <fdoddy@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> dump mp3 altogether and go AAC for compressed files. Much sweeter in general than mp3 at any bit rate.
>
>
> fritz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John McNamara <jfranmac@...>
> To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 10:32 pm
> Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
>
>
>
>
> Thank you!. I shouldn't be so afraid of 192..... i just dont want to hear the sizzle of the cymbals like you might get on XM....
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gary Brumm <gabru@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Sounds great John. If you lower the resolution of the file you should be able to reduce the file size dramatically
>
> and still have good fidelity..
>
>
>
>
>
> From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of john.mcnamara65
> Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 7:06 PM
> To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Couldn't post the full song, because it is 33 megs. But this is half of it. You will hear my Moog Rogue, a Yamaha CP70, a Hammond A100 and leslie and gobs of tron. What you won't hear because of file constraints is my tron through a Leslie. : )
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/mrjaisworld/mp3/Fields.mp3?attredirects=0&d=1
>