| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
I would have named the unit "Brian"
fritz
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Rudloff <doctorwho8@aol.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 1:05 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
The MD M100.
Bill "the Doctor" Rudloff
-----Original Message-----
From: tron400 <tron400@yahoo.com>
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, Jan 24, 2011 8:41 am
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
I would have named it something completely unrelated to the Mk or M series. Maybe Digitron?
Bernie
--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, "Charles" <charel196@...> wrote:
>
> I agree about the name...is there any documentation proving who named their instrument first? Not taking sides....just asking.
> What would YOU have named Markus' unit? I'd probably say something like MK8 (since it was next from the MK7) or M8000.
> And yes...I want one.....wish now I had ordered one before the price jump:(
>
> --- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, lsf5275@ wrote:
> >
> > It's a machine. It exists. It's poorly named. It does what it is supposed
> > to. Knowing Markus, it's probably well made. It's poorly named. It will
> > sell.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 1/23/2011 6:00:55 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > MAinPsych@ writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > BTW, none of my remarks should construed as defending Markus or demeaning
> > Streetly. I'm just commenting on what I have actually heard with my own
> > ears firsthand. Markus is a big boy and can defend himself, if needed.
> >
> > Frank 1
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 01/23/11 14:53:51 Pacific Standard Time, mainpsych
> > writes:
> >
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 01/23/11 08:14:35 Pacific Standard Time, lsf5275 writes:
> >
> > Clay,
> >
> > How would Markus sample all of those Chamberlin sounds. It is my
> > understanding that swapping tapes in any Chamberlin would be a pain in the ass. Even
> > if you were to sample the sounds from an old Music Master, the tapes would
> > likely be old and worn. Mattias has one now. so maybe he can tell us how
> > his tapes are. But even if they're great, they're not all of the sounds. So
> > if he wants to use the Chamberlin Masters, he would have to play them in a
> > Mark VI or a 400. Doing that alters the dynamics of the intended sound. But
> > then again, Markus makes no claim that I have seen, read or heard as to
> > how the tapes were sampled. Maybe the Chamberlin sounds were all sampled from
> > a Mellotron. Then they wouldn't be authentic, but who's gonna know?
> >
> >
> > We really need to move from the philosophical/speculative realm to the
> > real world, i.e., sonority (what sounds good). 50 people, 50 opinions, no
> > consensus, no progress. After all, strict music theory would dictate that the
> > dissonance of playing a B and a C together is a major no-no (or parallel
> > fifths), but listening to Wakeman's brass intro to "Siberian Khatru" says
> > it's perfect for that musical phrase, both starting and ending on such an
> > interval. I don't know Markus' sound source, but I can tell you firsthand
> > that, say, the Mellotron Cello and Chamberlin Cello can be played together or
> > solo on an M400D and you can move back and forth between the two by the
> > twist of a knob for an instant A/B comparison. While both are good,
> > objectively, the Chamby Cello is much more authentic sounding. The point being
> > that Markus could not have achieved that other than sampling a source oth er
> > than direct from tape.
> >
> >
> > My only real disappointment about Markus' machine is the name. I can
> > certainly see its appeal and its purpose. I'm not sure I am aware of his
> > marketing strategy, if any, but there certainly is interest. I am surprised that
> > he isn't more involved with the Mellotron community.
> >
> >
> > I had intended to ask Markus about this very issue; unfortunately, he was
> > not present at NAMM this year.
> >
> > Frank 1
> >
>