Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

No, they sit on me.

--- In newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com, lsf5275@... wrote:
>
> Bad Ass! Have you ever sat on them?
>
>
> In a message dated 1/22/2011 3:22:23 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> tron400@... writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have Harley Davidson eyeglass frames. They're really loud! Why? Are they
> Orange?
>
> Bernie
>
> --- In _newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_
> (mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) , lsf5275@ wrote:
> >
> > I hear Harley Davidson is going to make a bicycle with speakers on it
> that
> > play back the sounds of the big V-Twin when you pedal it around. It will
> > have the Harley Davidson Logo on it and since it still sounds just like
> the
> > big bike it must be a motorcycle.
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 1/22/2011 1:44:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > hessel@ writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > It seems to me that, for any device claiming to have authentic MELLOTRON
> > sounds onboard, capturing the MELLOTRON medium (tape! ) and capturing
> the
> > characteristic replay mechanism is very important and indeed what many
> > buyers would expect to hear from this device
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Op 22 jan. 2011 om 18:18 heeft "Charles" <_charel196@_
> > (mailto:charel196@) > het volgende geschreven:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > not a valid comparison...a guitar relies on the wood and strings for
> > sound. The Mellotron doesn't rely on it's cabinet. Does the plexiglass
> tron
> > sound different from the wooden ones?
> > The M4000D is a DIGITAL MELLOTRON....not a tape playback Mellotron...but
> > is entitled to the name nonetheless IMO since it is an offspring of the
> line
> > of instruments. As far as tuning & denoising etc. ruining or changing
> the
> > sound....aren't these the very things people have bitched about for
> > decades. Now someone fixes them and you bitch about that! (shakes
> head....walking
> > away....smiling)
> > Markus could offer non tuned/non-denoised versions of the sounds as an
> > option.And if you can detect the missing bits of analog tape sound in
> the
> > digital version you must have super hearing.
> > Yeah...the Classic Keys sounds aren't good. The E4K/Pinder CD sounds as
> > accurate as I need. I even have samples from my old 400 in it (hissy &
> out of
> > tune) every note sampled full length, non looped.
> >
> > --- In __newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_
> (mailto:_newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) _
> > (mailto:_newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com_
> (mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com) ) , lsf5275@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Charles,
> > >
> > > Suppose you make a wooden thing with a neck and buttons on it instead
> of
> > > strings. All of the sounds are digitized and you press buttons to get
> > the
> > > sounds. Is it a Guitar? It looks like a guitar, but is it a guitar?
> No.
> > A
> > > Mellotron or Chamberlin were TAPE playback machines. Just because you
> > make
> > > something that kinda looks like one and plays digital representations
> of
> > the
> > > original tape samples doesn't make them one.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In a message dated 1/22/2011 8:48:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> > > charel196@ writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I just don't get all this "it's not a Mellotron" talk....the digital
> > unit
> > > is a logical progression from tape replay and Ill bet Harry Chamberlin
> > would
> > > have moved into this area if he were alive now. The whole point was
> > > playing instrument sounds on a keyboard, not the tape technology
> (which
> > was the
> > > only method available)
> > > If all sounds are from original tapes and only last 8 seconds and are
> > the
> > > best digital representations that can be done, personally to me it's a
> > new
> > > Mellotron.It's the offspring of the tape machine. So what that it
> > doesn't
> > > use Chamberlin heads etc. With EQ'ing and processing I imagine you can
> > get
> > > near 1000% close.
> > > Heck I have used samples on my albums (from my EMU E4K, EMAX 1, and
> > > CLASSIC KEYS) sometimes on the same songs I used my real M400 (when I
> > had it) and
> > > I defy anyone to tell me which is which. And the E4K was using the
> > Pinder
> > > CD. The M4000D samples are said to be way beyond the Pinder CD in
> > quality.
> > > I think it's totally anal to hang on to tape playback technology as
> the
> > > only thing that can be called "Mellotron" or "Chamberlin". The 4000D
> is
> > just a
> > > new and different model in the family tree....made by the people who
> own
> > > the name and masters.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> 0.0.0
>