| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On 20 Jan 2011, at 23:41, mattias <Mattias.olsson5@comhem.se> wrote:
But who owns the right to the name Mellotron ?
Den 2011-01-21 00.33, skrev "tronbros" <tronbros@aol.com>:
Matthias, the ownership of the much celebrated, often emulated but never copied Mellotron trademark has never, ever had a bearing on anything. Most people remember Streetly first. And it cost nothing to get and costs nothing to uphold.
M
mellotronics.co.uk <http://mellotronics.co.uk>
On 20 Jan 2011, at 23:28, mattias <Mattias.olsson5@comhem.se> wrote:
Ha ha ! Great Comment !
Because Streetly owns the right to the name Mellotron right ?
Den 2011-01-20 23.22, skrev "John Wright" <john.wright@consona.com>:
I thought the US$500.00 increase was royalty payments to the UK for use of the name.
8-)
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tronbros
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 5:17 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com <mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: OT- NAMM 2011
Cock up on the abacus front. Now only 200US below the Memotron. Justice for the arrogance of calling it the M4000D!
M
mellotronics.co.uk <http://mellotronics.co.uk> <http://mellotronics.co.uk>
On 20 Jan 2011, at 20:52, "Charles" <charel196@yahoo.com <mailto:charel196%40yahoo.com> > wrote:
> so the M4000D has gone from $1995 to $2495....what can justify this price jump in such a short time frame?